Specify explanation, summarization, source retrieval or factual extraction. Keep it distinct from personalized advice, a final opinion, professional drafting or representation. Name the audience, jurisdiction and relevant date before checking the result.
Use only an approved tool and permitted data. Check client terms, confidentiality duties and retention settings before supplying material. A public chatbot is not an approved file store simply because it is convenient.
Check each citation against the primary statute, judgment, regulation or source document. Confirm the reference exists, the text matches and the jurisdiction and date fit. Read surrounding provisions for definitions, conditions and exceptions.
Check the names, amounts, dates and parties against the original papers. Look for facts omitted, assumptions presented as findings and obligations that were never in the source. Important or unclear points need a responsible qualified reviewer.
The person responsible for the informational task checks the communication and its limits. Correct unsupported claims and state material uncertainty. Internal approval does not turn an AI output into a professional legal opinion.
Retain a proportionate record of the input version, tool, checked sources, corrections and approval. Follow the confidentiality, disclosure and retention duties that apply to the engagement, including any required disclosure of AI use.
Check the jurisdiction, date and facts before relying on a source.
Verify the task, input, sources and facts before using AI information. Keep a review trail and reserve professional legal decisions for separately engaged counsel.
Specify explanation, summarization, source retrieval or factual extraction. Keep it distinct from personalized advice, a final opinion, professional drafting or representation. Name the audience, jurisdiction and relevant date before checking the result.
Use only an approved tool and permitted data. Check client terms, confidentiality duties and retention settings before supplying material. A public chatbot is not an approved file store simply because it is convenient.
Check each citation against the primary statute, judgment, regulation or source document. Confirm the reference exists, the text matches and the jurisdiction and date fit. Read surrounding provisions for definitions, conditions and exceptions.
Check the names, amounts, dates and parties against the original papers. Look for facts omitted, assumptions presented as findings and obligations that were never in the source. Important or unclear points need a responsible qualified reviewer.
The person responsible for the informational task checks the communication and its limits. Correct unsupported claims and state material uncertainty. Internal approval does not turn an AI output into a professional legal opinion.
Retain a proportionate record of the input version, tool, checked sources, corrections and approval. Follow the confidentiality, disclosure and retention duties that apply to the engagement, including any required disclosure of AI use.
Check each source against your jurisdiction and facts before acting.
Tell our team what you need. We’ll discuss the available route, scope and next step.